Chilling Effects
Home Weather Reports Report Receiving a Cease and Desist Notice Search the Database Topics
Sending
Topic HomeFAQsMonitoring the legal climate for Internet activity
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
 Chilling Effects Clearinghouse > Protest, Parody and Criticism Sites > Notices > Request for Immediate Removal of Site Printer-friendly version

August 24, 2007

 

Sender Information:
Basic Research
Sent by: [Private]
[Private]
Salt Lake City, UT, 84116, USA

Recipient Information:
[Private]
The Mail Archive
Mountain View, CA, 94041, USA


Sent via: email
Re: Request for Immediate Removal of Site

NOTICE
[This e-mail and any attachments are subject to Disclaimers listed at
the end.]
______________________________

PLEASE SEE BELOW.

From: [private]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:51 PM
To: 'abuse at minder.net'
Subject: Request for Immediate

Removal of Site

Dear Sir or Madam:

This is a request for the immediate removal of the following site from
your website: http://www.mail-archive.com/cypherpunks@minder.net/msg70391.html.
This site has derogatory remarks about our company and owners. We
have obtained a final judgment and permanent injunction from the
United State District Court in Texas for the removal of this site.
We also have a letter of apology from the author. All have been
attached for your convenient reference. Please confirm the immediate
removal of this site to me as soon as possible. If you have any
questions, please contact me. Thank you for your prompt attention to
this matter.


[private], CLA

Paralegal

Basic Research

[private]

Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Telephone: [private]

______________________________

THREE DISCLAIMERS: (1) The contents of this transmission may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential, or
otherwise is legally exempt from disclosure. This e-mail solely is
intended for the use of the recipient(s) identified above. If you are
not an intended recipient, you may not review, disseminate, distribute
or duplicate this e-mail or any attachment. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete this
message. (2) No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any
binding agreement on behalf of any entity sending or referred-to in
this e-mail without express written confirmation by senior management.
(3) Although the sender has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no
viruses are present in this e-mail, the sender and any entity
referred-to in this e-mail cannot accept responsibility for any loss
or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments (if any).

 
FAQ: Questions and Answers

[back to notice text]


Question: What is the legal definition of defamation?

Answer: The elements that must be proved to establish defamation are: (1) A publication to one other than the person defamed; (2) of a false statement of fact; (3) which is understood as being of and concerning the plaintiff; and (4) which is understood in such a way as to tend to harm the reputation of plaintiff.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is defamation?

Answer: An attack by speech on the good reputation of a person or business entity. Speech that involves a public figure--such as a corporation--is only defamatory if it is false and said with actual malice. It also must be factual rather than an expression of an opinion. In the United States, because of our strong free speech protections, it is almost impossible to prove defamation of a public figure.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is disparagement?

Answer: As defined in Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed. 1999), disparagement is "A false and injurious statement that discredits or detracts from the reputation of another's property, product, or business. To recover in tort for disparagement, the plaintiff must prove that the statement caused a third party to take some action resulting in specific pecuniary loss to the plaintiff."


[back to notice text]


Question: What is libel?

Answer: Libel is a defamatory statement expressed in a fixed medium, usually writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast. See What is the legal definition of defamation?


[back to notice text]


Question: Can an opinion be defamatory?

Answer: No ? but merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database").


[back to notice text]


Question: What is a "Permanent Injunction"?

Answer: An injunction is "A court order commanding or preventing an action. * To get an injunction, the complainant must show that there is no plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law and that an irreparable injury will result unless the relief is granted... [A]permanent injunction [is] [a]n injunction granted after a final hearing on the merits. * Despite its name, a permanent injunction does not necessarily last forever."


Topic maintained by USF Law School - IIP Justice Project

Topic Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers)
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse - www.chillingeffects.org
disclaimer / privacy / about us & contacts