FAQ: Questions and Answers

[back to notice text] Question: Who may hold a copyright? Answer: A copyright ordinarily vests in the creator or creators of a work (known as the author(s)), and is inherited as ordinary property. Copyrights are freely transferrable as property, at the discretion of the owner. 17 U.S.C. ?201(a), (d). In some cases, however, the actual creator is not considered the author of the work for copyright purposes: if a work is created by an employee in the regular course of her employment, it is considered a "work for hire" and the employer, not the employee, is considered the "author" of the work for copyright purposes. For example, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, a staff writer for a newspaper does not hold the copyrights in her product, the newspaper does. This only applies to works created in the ordinary course of employment: if the same reporter writes a novel in her spare time, she herself owns that copyright. Certain commissioned works may also be considered works for hire. 17 U.S.C. ?201(b); Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989). The term "work for hire" is defined in 17 U.S.C. ?101. [back to notice text] Question: What kinds of things are copyrightable? Answer: In order for material to be copyrightable, it must be original and must be in a fixed medium. Only material that originated with the author can support a copyright. Items from the public domain which appear in a work, as well as work borrowed from others, cannot be the subject of an infringement claim. Also, certain stock material might not be copyrightable, such as footage that indicates a location like the standard shots of San Francisco in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Also exempted are stock characters like the noisy punk rocker who gets the Vulcan death grip in Star Trek IV. The requirement that works be in a fixed medium leaves out certain forms of expression, most notably choreography and oral performances such as speeches. For instance, if I perform a Klingon death wail in a local park, my performance is not copyrightable. However, if I film the performance, then the film is copyrightable. Single words and short phrases are generally not protected by copyright, even when the name has been "coined" or newly-created by the mark owner. Logos that include original design elements can be protected under copyright or under trademark. Otherwise, words, phrases and titles may be protected only by trademark, however. [back to notice text] Question: What rights are protected by copyright law? Answer: The purpose of copyright law is to encourage creative work by granting a temporary monopoly in an author's original creations. This monopoly takes the form of six rights in areas where the author retains exclusive control. These rights are: (1) the right of reproduction (i.e., copying), (2) the right to create derivative works, (3) the right to distribution, (4) the right to performance, (5) the right to display, and (6) the digital transmission performance right. The law of copyright protects the first two rights in both private and public contexts, whereas an author can only restrict the last four rights in the public sphere. Claims of infringement must show that the defendant exercised one of these rights. For example, if I create unauthorized videotape copies of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and distribute them to strangers on the street, then I have infringed both the copyright holder's rights of reproduction and distribution. If I merely re-enact The Wrath of Khan for my family in my home, then I have not infringed on the copyright. Names, ideas and facts are not protected by copyright. Trademark law, in contrast, is designed to protect consumers from confusion as to the source of goods (as well as to protect the trademark owner's market). To this end, the law gives the owner of a registered trademark the right to use the mark in commerce without confusion. If someone introduces a trademark into the market that is likely to cause confusion, then the newer mark infringes on the older one. The laws of trademark infringement and dilution protect against this likelihood of confusion. Trademark protects names, images and short phrases. Infringement protects against confusion about the origin of goods. The plaintiff in an infringement suit must show that defendant's use of the mark is likely to cause such a confusion. For instance, if I were an unscrupulous manufacturer, I might attempt to capitalize on the fame of Star Trek by creating a line of 'Spock Activewear.' If consumers could reasonably believe that my activewear was produced or endorsed by the owners of the Spock trademark, then I would be liable for infringement. The law of trademark dilution protects against confusion concerning the character of a registered trademark. Suppose I created a semi-automatic assault rifle and marketed it as 'The Lt. Uhura 5000.' Even if consumers could not reasonably believe that the Star Trek trademark holders produced this firearm, the trademark holders could claim that my use of their mark harmed the family-oriented character of their mark. I would be liable for dilution. [back to notice text] Question: Does a copyright owner have to specify the exact materials it alleges are infringing? Answer: Proper notice under the safe harbor provisions requires the copyright owners to specifically identify the alleged infringing materials, or if the service provider is an "information location tool" such as a search engine, to specifically identify the links to the alleged infringing materials. [512(c)(3)(iii)], [512(d)(3)]. The provisions also require the copyright owners to identify the copyrighted work, or a representative list of the copyrighted works, that is claimed to be infringed. [512(c)(3)(A)(ii)]. Rather than simply sending a letter to the service provider that claims that infringing material exists on their system, these qualifications ensure that service providers are given a reasonable amount of information to locate the infringing materials and to effectively police their networks. [512(c)(3)(A)(iii)], [512(d)(3)]. However, in the recent case of ALS Scan, Inc. v. Remarq Communities, Inc., the court found that the copyright owner did not have to point out all of the infringing material, but only substantially all of the material. The relaxation of this specificity requirement shifts the burden of identifying the material to the service provider, raising the question of the extent to which a service provider must search through its system. OSP customers should note that this situation might encourage OSP's to err on the side of removing allegedly infringing material. [back to notice text] Question: What are the DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions? Answer: In 1998, Congress passed the On-Line Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act (OCILLA) in an effort to protect service providers on the Internet from liability for the activities of its users. Codified as section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), this new law exempts on-line service providers that meet the criteria set forth in the safe harbor provisions from claims of copyright infringement made against them that result from the conduct of their customers. These safe harbor provisions are designed to shelter service providers from the infringing activities of their customers. If a service provider qualifies for the safe harbor exemption, only the individual infringing customer are liable for monetary damages; the service provider's network through which they engaged in the alleged activities is not liable. [back to notice text] Question: What is copyright infringement? Are there any defenses? Answer: Infringement occurs whenever someone who is not the copyright holder (or a licensee of the copyright holder) exercises one of the exclusive rights listed above. The most common defense to an infringement claim is "fair use," a doctrine that allows people to use copyrighted material without permission in certain situations, such as quotations in a book review. To evaluate fair use of copyrighted material, the courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of the use the nature of the copyrighted work the amount and substantiality of copying, and the market effect. (17 U.S.C. 107) The most significant factor in this analysis is the fourth, effect on the market. If a copier's use supplants demand for the original work, then it will be very difficult for him or her to claim fair use. On the other hand, if the use does not compete with the original, for example because it is a parody, criticism, or news report, it is more likely to be permitted as "fair use." Trademarks are generally subject to fair use in two situations: First, advertisers and other speakers are allowed to use a competitor's trademark when referring to that competitor's product ("nominative use"). Second, the law protects "fair comment," for instance, in parody. [back to notice text] Question: What is the purpose of the fair use defense? Answer: There is no easy answer to this question. However, one way to approach the question is to examine the purposes of the copyright laws. The clause of the Constitution that gives Congress the power to enact copyright laws indicates that the purpose of the given power is to "promote the progress of science and the useful arts" by allowing authors to secure the exclusive rights in their works for "limited times." Thus, many see the Constitutional scheme behind copyright as a kind of balance between (1) forming incentives for authors to create new works by giving them rights that will allow them to make money from their works, and (2) limiting the rights so that the works themselves are useful to the public and in turn advance the "progress of science and the useful arts." Fair use fits into this scheme by giving the public the right to use copyrighted works in certain situations even though the author has exclusive rights. That is, in some circumstances, such as certain uses involving scholarship or research, the "progress" referred to in the Constitution is best promoted and the public is best served by allowing an unauthorized use of the copyrighted work. These uses are deemed fair because they are consistent with the power given to Congress to enact copyright laws. [back to notice text] Question: What are the counter-notice and put-back procedures? Answer: In order to ensure that copyright owners do not wrongly insist on the removal of materials that actually do not infringe their copyrights, the safe harbor provisions require service providers to notify the subscribers if their materials have been removed and to provide them with an opportunity to send a written notice to the service provider stating that the material has been wrongly removed. [512(g)] If a subscriber provides a proper "counter-notice" claiming that the material does not infringe copyrights, the service provider must then promptly notify the claiming party of the individual's objection. [512(g)(2)] If the copyright owner does not bring a lawsuit in district court within 14 days, the service provider is then required to restore the material to its location on its network. [512(g)(2)(C)] A proper counter-notice must contain the following information: The subscriber's name, address, phone number and physical or electronic signature [512(g)(3)(A)] Identification of the material and its location before removal [512(g)(3)(B)] A statement under penalty of perjury that the material was removed by mistake or misidentification [512(g)(3)(C)] Subscriber consent to local federal court jurisdiction, or if overseas, to an appropriate judicial body. [512(g)(3)(D)] If it is determined that the copyright holder misrepresented its claim regarding the infringing material, the copyright holder then becomes liable to the OSP for any damages that resulted from the improper removal of the material. [512(f)] [back to notice text] Question: What does a service provider have to do in order to qualify for safe harbor protection? Answer: In addition to informing its customers of its policies (discussed above), a service provider must follow the proper notice and takedown procedures (discussed above) and also meet several other requirements in order to qualify for exemption under the safe harbor provisions. In order to facilitate the notification process in cases of infringement, ISPs which allow users to store information on their networks, such as a web hosting service, must designate an agent that will receive the notices from copyright owners that its network contains material which infringes their intellectual property rights. The service provider must then notify the Copyright Office of the agent's name and address and make that information publicly available on its web site. [512(c)(2)] Finally, the service provider must not have knowledge that the material or activity is infringing or of the fact that the infringing material exists on its network. [512(c)(1)(A)], [512(d)(1)(A)]. If it does discover such material before being contacted by the copyright owners, it is instructed to remove, or disable access to, the material itself. [512(c)(1)(A)(iii)], [512(d)(1)(C)]. The service provider must not gain any financial benefit that is attributable to the infringing material. [512(c)(1)(B)], [512(d)(2)]. [back to notice text] Question: Don't judges review subpoenas before they are sent to ISPs? Answer: No. The issuing of civil subpoenas is not monitored by the court handling the case. Under the normal rules of discovery in civil lawsuits, parties to a suit can simply send a subpoena to anyone they believe has information that could be useful. That information doesn't even have to be relevant to the lawsuit, as long as it could possibly lead to the discovery of relevant information. The only way that a court will evaluate an identity-seeking subpena is if either the ISP or the target of the subpoena files a motion asking the judge to block the subpoena. Unfortunately, in practice that rarely happens. That is because these subpoenas usually have a short, roughly 7-day deadline, and because many people never even find out that their Internet data has been subpoenaed. [back to notice text] Question: What can be kept as a trade secret? Answer: A trade secret is information that provides a business with a competitive advantage. The following section provides examples of circumstances where trade secret protection was approved or denied. Courts have provided trade secret protection to formulas, patterns, plans, designs, physical devices, processes, software, and ?know-how.? Examples of these trade secret categories are provided below. Please keep in mind that different courts may reach contrary conclusions concerning trade secret status with respect to what may appear to be identical matters. You may wish to consult a lawyer in your local area to obtain information on your state?s laws. FORMULA: A formula (i.e., a recipe that allows one to create a product) can be a trade secret. One of the most familiar examples of a trade secret formula is the Coca-Cola formula. This formula gives the Coca-Cola Company a significant business advantage in the soda market, as there is no other soda that tastes the same. The Coca-Cola Company has put numerous security measures in place to keep its formula a secret. In fact, the Coca Cola Company ensures that no one knows every step of the formula! Other common formulas found to be trade secrets in the food, drug, and cosmetics industry include formulas for butter flavoring, cheese, breakfast cereal, seasoning for fried chicken, special diet rations for dogs, mixed alcoholic beverages, lipstick, and hair conditioner. On the other hand, formulas for a lemon-flavored soft drink, recipes and cooking procedures for common dishes such as BBQ chicken and bakery goods were all denied trade secret protection. PATTERNS, PLANS, & DESIGNS : A pattern, plan or design can be a trade secret. For example, courts have found the following to be trade secrets: circuitry for an advanced minicomputer, color TV circuitry, schematics for an analog circuit, plans and specifications for gears and rollers of a photo-processing machine, plans for drilling equipment, plans and designs for a veneer dryer, molds for the manufacture of street markers, and a design for a grating. PHYSICAL DEVICE : A physical device used in manufacturing can be a trade secret. Examples of these devices found to be trade secrets include: a device for manufacturing radio parts, machinery and equipment used to manufacture polyethylene, machinery and equipment used to manufacture saw grade diamonds, a computer tool used to service microprocessor-based elevators, a tool for making a pressure-sensing mechanism, a machine for inking carbon paper and ribbons, and an adhesive-tape machine. PROCESS : A process, method or technique used to make the final end product can also be a trade secret. The following is an example of using a process as a trade secret: Suppose you work at a hair salon and when a customer wants you to dye his or her hair, you use a hair dye formula that is pre-bottled. However, you have also developed your own unique process in applying the formula to hair so that the hair color stays longer. Because your process gives you a competitive business advantage, you may obtain trade secret protection of your dye process. Other examples of processes found to be trade secrets include: a process to manufacture foam crash pads, a process to treat metal, a process to manufacture fiberglass, a method and procedure to manufacture epoxy resin rods, a process to manufacture potassium sulfate, and a process for an environmentally sound method to manufacture coated paper. Keep in mind that processes and methods incident with a patent may still constitute a trade secret. See below for more information on patents and trade secrets. ?KNOW-HOW? : "Know-how" can be a trade secret. A method or technique in some cases might fall into the ?process? category, but many methods and techniques can be better described as ?know-how" (i.e., information and experiential expertise related to using formulas or processes.) When asserting methods and techniques in this category, however, one must be very specific in describing the method or technique. Examples of trade secrets in this area include: know-how pertaining to the construction of plant chemicals, methods for testing procedures to assure the quality of raw material, know-how to ascertain whether CAT scanning equipment and components are operating according to specifications and to identify malfunctions, and methods to manufacture typewriters. [back to notice text] Question: What does ?misappropriating? a trade secret mean? Answer: One has ??misappropriated? a trade secret if he or she has acquired, disclosed, or used the trade secret information without the permission of the holder, where such activities were done through improper means (e.g., the trade secret information was stolen from the holder) or in breach of an obligation of confidentiality or non-use. If you have received a letter stating that you have ?misappropriated? a trade secret (see SAMPLE LETTERS; also see TRADE SECRET LAWS), you should consult with an attorney. [back to notice text] Question: What are the notice and takedown procedures for web sites? Answer: In order to have an allegedly infringing web site removed from a service provider's network, or to have access to an allegedly infringing website disabled, the copyright owner must provide notice to the service provider with the following information: The name, address, and electronic signature of the complaining party [512(c)(3)(A)(i)] The infringing materials and their Internet location [512(c)(3)(A)(ii-iii)], or if the service provider is an "information location tool" such as a search engine, the reference or link to the infringing materials [512(d)(3)]. Sufficient information to identify the copyrighted works [512(c)(3)(A)(iv)]. A statement by the owner that it has a good faith belief that there is no legal basis for the use of the materials complained of [512(c)(3)(A)(v)]. A statement of the accuracy of the notice and, under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on the behalf of the owner [512(c)(3)(A)(vi)]. Once notice is given to the service provider, or in circumstances where the service provider discovers the infringing material itself, it is required to expeditiously remove, or disable access to, the material. The safe harbor provisions do not require the service provider to notify the individual responsible for the allegedly infringing material before it has been removed, but they do require notification after the material is removed. [back to notice text] Question: What do courts consider in determining if a trade secret exists? Answer: Courts usually consider the following three factors in determining whether you have a trade secret: (1) Is the information deemed to be a "trade secret" valuable to the business? Only secret information can be protected by trade secret law. Secrecy is typically determined by evaluating whether or not the information is "generally known" or "readily ascertainable." If the information is secret, you must consider whether the secret information is valuable to your business. How would you rank its value? Courts tend to find that the information is a trade secret if the information is so valuable as to significantly impact the operations of a business. (2) What steps have been taken to keep the information secret? Trade secret laws require that you have taken some action to keep your information a secret. The security procedure taken to protect the information is often the most important evidence that the information constitutes a trade secret. For example, courts have often found that restricting access (on a "need to know" basis) to any sensitive information is a factor that helps to meet this requirement. Courts have also found that physical security, such as keeping written trade secret information in a locked drawer and granting very limited access to it, can meet this requirement. Generally, holders of trade secrets develop a formal system for safeguarding their trade secret information. Such a system can include, for example, reviewing information to be sure that the secret information is not included in documents sent to customers and competitors. In addition, proprietary notices can be placed on all documents containing information related to trade secrets and strict confidentiality provisions can be written into all consulting, manufacturing, employment, and/or non-disclosure agreements. (3) To what extent do employees and others involved in the business know about the information? What about people outside the business? The extent that those in your business and those outside the business have access to the information can affect a court's decision as to whether you have a legal trade secret. Generally, courts have found the information to be public knowledge and not a trade secret if people who do not have a need to know the information have access to it. This is especially true if many people outside the company are familiar with the information.

Topic maintained by Stanford Center for Internet & Society