Chilling Effects
Home Weather Reports Report Receiving a Cease and Desist Notice Search the Database Topics
Sending
Topic HomeFAQsMonitoring the legal climate for Internet activity
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
 Chilling Effects Clearinghouse > Documenting Your Domain Defense > Notices > Chips vie with Spies for INTEL Printer-friendly version

Chips vie with Spies for INTEL

March 15, 2001

 

Sender Information:
Intel Corporation
Sent by: [Private]
Howrey Simon Arnold & White
Menlo Park, Ca, 94025, USA

Recipient Information:
[Private]
Spy Tech Agency
West Hollywood, CA, 90069, USA


Sent via: Certified Mail
Re: Use of INTEL BULLETIN Designation in Web Site as an E-mail Address

Dear [Private],

We are intellectual property counsel for Intel Corporation ("Intel"). We are writing to you in connection with Spy Tech Agency's use of the mark INTEL BULLETIN on your www.spytechagency.com web site and as an e-mail address.

As you may know, Intel is the owner of a number of United States and worldwide trademark registrations for the mark INTEL for a wide variety of products and services, including computer hardware, computer software, and wireless telecommunication products. Moreover, Intel has invested substantial time, money and effort to establish recognition of its INTEL mark among consumers. Its extensive advertising and promotional efforts, as well as those if its licensees, have resulted in the INTEL mark becoming a famous mark throughout the United States and the world. This mark is an asset of immense value to Intel. Consequently, Intel vigilantly polices third party users of names and marks that would likely confuse consumers or suggest some relationship between Intel and the third party's business or products, or which would dilute the significant association of the INTEL marks with Intel.

Intel is concerned that Spy Tech Agency's use of the mark INTEL BULLETIN for an on-line magazine and as an e-mail address is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deceive consumers with respect to the source, affiliation or sponsorship of your client's goods and services, in violation of Federal and state law. In particular, the INTEL BULLETIN mark and e-mail address wholly-incorporates the INTEL mark as the dominant and only distinctive portion of the mark. The word BULLETIN is generic for all types of publications and does not serve to distinguish your mark from the INTEL trademark; Spy Tech Agency is making unadorned use of the INTEL trademark; Spy Tech Agency's use of the INTEL mark could lead a reasonable consumer to believe that Spy Tech Agency is offering computing, security and telecommunication services, supported by or affiliated with the Intel Corporation.

It is well established that Intel is one of the world leaders in computer products and services, including hardware and software. Intel develops, manufactures, and sells a broad spectrum of high-technology, state-of-the-art products and services, ranging from the bedrock "ingredients" of computing architecture and personal computers, such as computer microprocessors, microchips, chip sets, computer memory, circuit boards, computer systems, and software, to computing, networking, security and telecommunications products, such as data encryption, compression and security products, digital imaging and transmission products, products for digital cameras and video conferencing, networking products, and products for use in wireless telecommunications and voice mail systems. Intel is widely recognized as a world leader in high-technology products and services.

Intel is also currently offering a variety of application service providers services under the Intel mark. Intel has offered internet service provider services, web-hosting and consulting services, e-commerce processing services, DSL network services, computer system consulting and they are extensively involved in cellular telephone technology: all these services will be offered over local and global computer networks. As such, your proposed use of INTEL BULLETIN for on-line publications and as an e-mail address infringes upon Intel's INTEL marks for goods and services.

Furthermore, the potential diluting effect of your INTEL BULLETIN mark on the famous INTEL mark is a serious concern. Such us of the INTEL BULLETIN mark will result in dilution of Intel's valuable trademark in violation of Federal and state law. Dilution occurs when a defendant uses a name that is identical or very similar to a trademark owner's famous trademark and thereby lessens the distinctive quality of the trademark owner's mark. Dilution can occur without confusion in the marketplace, and despite differences between the trademark owner's and defendant's goods and services (e.g. Kodak for shoes).

In light of the foregoing, Intel is considering taking action against Spy Tech Agency's INTEL BULLETIN mark and e-mail address in the event use of the designation is not stopped completely. However, Intel welcomes the opportunity to resolve this matter amicably.

Accordingly, we would like to discuss with you a resolution under which Spy Tech Agency: (1) ceases all use and agrees not to use the INTEL BULLETIN mark or e-mail address in the United States and world-wide; and (2) agrees not to use or register any confusingly similar mark, domain name or e-mail address in the United States, or world-wide, in the future.

We are hopeful that a resolution can be reached along the lines set forth above. Please let us have your response by March 29, 2001.

This letter is not a complete statement of Intel's rights in connection with this matter and nothing contained herein is intended, nor should be construed, as an express or implied waiver of any rights, remedies or defenses that Intel may have relating to the matter, all of which are expressly reserved.

We look forward to hearing from you.


Very truly yours,

[Private]

 
FAQ: Questions and Answers

[back to notice text]


Question: What is "intellectual property"?

Answer: Intellectual property refers to the rights one has in the product of one's intellect. This includes copyright (rights in creative expression)and patents (rights in inventions, discoveries, methods, compositions of matter, etc.) which are granted by article I, section 8 clause 8 of the US Constitution which gives Congress the power to "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

Related rights include trademark (rights in the names one uses to identify one's goods and services), trade secret (confidential business practices), unfair trade practice, passing off, trade libel, false advertising, misappropriation. Laws protecting most of these rights exist at both the state and federal level. "Proprietary rights" is just a general term meaning "one's own rights."


[back to notice text]


Question: How do I register a trademark?

Answer: There are three ways to register:

  1. file a use application, which lets someone who is already using the mark register it,
  2. file an intent to use application, which states that you honestly intend to use the mark in commerce. The mark must be associated with commerce, instead of simply being a mark that you want to reserve. Merely using the mark in advertising or promotion does not qualify under this category -- the use must be associated with an actual commercial purpose, or
  3. (non-US applicants only) file based on an existing foreign registration.
All applications require a fee. Remember that it is not necessary to register a trademark to gain protection in the United States.

Four months after registration, the trademark application is examined by an attorney at the PTO. The attorney determines whether the mark is registerable. If not, the applicant receives a letter stating the grounds for refusal and information on needed corrections (if applicable). If the attorney requests additional information, the applicant has six months to respond; after six months, the application is deemed abandoned.

The most common reason for being unable to register is that the mark is confusingly similar to an existing mark. If the attorney finds a conflicting mark and cannot grant the application, the PTO does not refund the application fee.

If the mark can be registered and the application passes, the attorney approves the mark for publication in the PTO?s Official Gazette. When the mark is published in the Gazette, anyone who opposes registration must state their opposition within thirty days.

For marks used in commerce before filing that are unopposed, the PTO registers the mark, and the certificate of registration is available about twelve weeks after publishing. If the application is based on intention to use the mark in commerce, the PTO issues a notice of allowance. This notice lasts for six months, during which the applicant must

  1. use the trademark in commerce and submit a statement of use, or
  2. request an extension to file a statement of use.
Once the PTO approves the statement of use, registration is complete.

Anyone with trademark rights can use the trademark symbol TM or service mark symbol SM to designate ownership. This serves notice to the public that you have claim to the designated mark. However, only a mark registered with the PTO may use the symbol ?.


[back to notice text]


Question: Where can I find federal trademark registrations?

Answer: The United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) keeps the US federal registry of trademarks. It has an online search capability, TESS, which contains more than 3 million pending, registered and dead federal trademarks. This database may not be complete. One should check the News page to see how current the information actually is.

Be aware: not all trademarks are contained in the US federal register. There are state trademarks, unregistered (common law marks) and foreign marks as well. A mark does not have to be registered to be valid.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is a famous mark?

Answer: A famous mark is a mark that has become so well known, that it has become almost universally recognized. An example of such a mark would be "McDonald's" or "Coca-Cola." Famous marks become important where an owner of a trademark is claiming trademark dilution against a defendant. The Federal Anti-Dilution Act of 1996 provides that an owner of a famous mark is entitled to an injunction where a defendant's use of the mark causes dilution of the distinctive quality of the owner's famous mark. In determining whether a mark is famous, a court will consider a list of eight factors, found in the 1996 Federal Anti-Dilution Act.


[back to notice text]


Question: What implication does alleged confusion have on claims of trademark infringement?

Answer: A mark that is confusingly similar so closely resembles a registered trademark that it is likely to confuse consumers as to the source of the product or service. Consumers could be likely to believe that the product with the confusingly similar mark is produced by the organization that holds the registered mark. Someone who holds a confusingly similar mark benefits from the good will associated with the registered mark and can lure customers to his/her product or service instead. Infringement is determined by whether your mark is confusingly similar to a registered mark. The factors that determine infringement include:

  • proof of actual confusion
  • strength of the established mark
  • proximity of the goods in the marketplace
  • similarity of the marks? sound
  • appearance and meaning
  • how the goods are marketed
  • type of product and how discerning the customer is
  • intent behind selecting the mark
  • likelihood of expansion in the market of the goods


[back to notice text]


Question: What is trademark dilution?

Answer: A type of infringement of a famous trademark in which the defendant's use, while not causing a likelihood of confusion, tarnishes the image or blurs the distintiveness of the plaintiff's mark. For example, if someone tries to sell "KODAK" pianos, KODAK could stop the person--even if consumers were not confused--because "KODAK" is a famous mark, and its use on products other than film and film-printing accessories (or other products on which Eastman Kodak places the mark) dilutes its uniqueness.

Many states have anti-dilution laws. The federal government only recently enacted anti-dilution legislation; see the Federal Trademark Dilution Act at 15 USC 1125(c).


[back to notice text]


Question: What is false designation of origin?

Answer: It covers similar ground to trademark infringement, but is more specific to misrepresentation of source, and applies even when there is no trademark at issue. If your website makes it appear that you sell products made by Company X, but in fact you make these products in your garage, Company X might accuse you of falsely designating the origin of (or "passing off") your items.


[back to notice text]


Question: Where can I find federal trademark law?

Answer: To be protected by federal trademark law, the marked goods and services must be used in interstate commerce. Federal trademark law is known as the Lanham Act. It protects marks that are registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office as well as those that are in use but never registered.

Court opinions and United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) regulations also interpret trademark rights and remedies. See the links to court sites provided by the Legal Information Insitute.


[back to notice text]


Question: Where can I find state trademark law?

Answer: Each state has its own laws governing use of trademarks within its borders. To locate the trademark laws of the 50 states, use the Legal Information Institute links. Both legislation and court opinions create trademark rights and remedies.

If marks are used in interstate commerce, then federal law will also apply.


[back to notice text]


Question: What about common words that are used for many purposes?

Answer: Common words and alphabetical letters can be protectable trademarks if they are used in arbitrary or unusual ways. One cannot trademark DIESEL to sell that generic type of fuel, otherwise no other diesel fuel dealer could use the word to identify the product. However, one could trademark DIESEL as a brand of ice cream. The owner of the ice cream mark can't use its rights to prevent fuel dealers from using the word on their station pumps nor can it prevent anyone else from using the word for non-trademark purposes, such as a website listing diesel fuel dealers.

In general, the more a mark describes the good or service that it labels, the less strong the trademark protection it gets and the more freedom others have to use the same word for other purposes.

See also this question on the strength of trademarks.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is trademark infringement?

Answer: Although different courts have different tests, the central concept is confusion in the marketplace. The law protects against consumer confusion by ensuring that the marks on the same or similar products or services are sufficiently different. A plaintiff in a trademark infringement case generally must prove 1) it possesses a valid mark; 2) that the defendant used the mark; 3) that the defendant used the mark in commerce, "in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution or advertising "of goods and services; and 4) that the defendant used the mark in a manner likely to confuse consumers.


Topic maintained by USF Law School - IIP Justice Project

Topic Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers)
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse - www.chillingeffects.org
disclaimer / privacy / about us & contacts